Dude, it's called Java Job Interview
I pity the owner or stakeholders of companies who hires god-like asshats in their Software Engineering section. Those uber-coder-turned-CTO or whatever who doesn't know how to pick their own in just 3 hours or less. These high-IQ individuals tend to overlook EQs, which effectively push them downwards to the intellectual echelon.
For technical jobs especially Java-related ones, any type of on-the-spot exam barely proves anything. Whether it's online or written and be subjected to batteries of technical interviews if the candidates happen to pass their so-high-standard tests. I observed that these kind of tests are simply more of intimidation contests rather than getting the right person for the job. These techniques are top time-wasters and outdated, it was formulated by men with fragile egos to protect. They will say these are standard company procedures, WELL, FUCK YOU! Some of it was written by morons who has nothing better to do, and definitely wasting company resources by missing the right people who are truly capable.
I can always get a good guy, not necessarily great ones but capable, in just a three-hour or less semi-technical-behavioural one-on-one interaction. Ok, I will not call it an interview because when I do conduct such things I make sure I don't make the candidate feel he/she is somewhere in Guantanamo. The secret to this selection process is PREPARATION. Every candidates has a unique sets of questions prepared for them based on what they claim to know in their CVs. So making standardized interview questions is a big NO-NO! Preparation will always pay off. My interview sequence always goes this way:
What are the "can opener" questions? These are some of the example questions that I usually starts with, let's say the candidate has extensively wrote about Spring in his CV:
At this part, while you're still browsing halfway of the candidate's CV. You know if he/she's a go or no go. And can immediately write your recommendations. Potentially save your company some money etc. etc.
I have mastered this skill during my days on the Dark Side. You can formulate your own questions too. But the real key is preparation.
For technical jobs especially Java-related ones, any type of on-the-spot exam barely proves anything. Whether it's online or written and be subjected to batteries of technical interviews if the candidates happen to pass their so-high-standard tests. I observed that these kind of tests are simply more of intimidation contests rather than getting the right person for the job. These techniques are top time-wasters and outdated, it was formulated by men with fragile egos to protect. They will say these are standard company procedures, WELL, FUCK YOU! Some of it was written by morons who has nothing better to do, and definitely wasting company resources by missing the right people who are truly capable.
I can always get a good guy, not necessarily great ones but capable, in just a three-hour or less semi-technical-behavioural one-on-one interaction. Ok, I will not call it an interview because when I do conduct such things I make sure I don't make the candidate feel he/she is somewhere in Guantanamo. The secret to this selection process is PREPARATION. Every candidates has a unique sets of questions prepared for them based on what they claim to know in their CVs. So making standardized interview questions is a big NO-NO! Preparation will always pay off. My interview sequence always goes this way:
- Introduction of myself and what am I to the organization I represent
- Asking the candidate how to address him/her.
- Then the "can opener" questions
What are the "can opener" questions? These are some of the example questions that I usually starts with, let's say the candidate has extensively wrote about Spring in his CV:
- "So what do you do in your current job?"
- "So you've mentioned in your CV that you have used Spring, What's good about it?"
- "What's your most difficult problem in using Spring?"
- "When do you prefer not to use IoC?"
- "Tell me about your experience in working on a team"
- "Tell me about your most difficult teammate"
- "Tell me about your most challenging design problems"
At this point, the candidate will express vaguely about what he/she does. And take note, almost everyone in this position will almost, always be honest.
Please listen carefully on this part and stop being a zealot for a while, if you tend not to like what the candidate will going to say. This is where your own EQ will be tested. Do not confront the candidate. Give brownie points on keywords like IoC, DI, etc. etc.
Case-to-case basis, you will know that the candidate is better than you when you hear something new and makes sense.
Again, listen and you will get some points for yourself here as well. But stupidity will show it's obvious head. You will find out how easy it is.
Never ask "Have you worked on a team?". Because that is answerable by yes/no and you will find yourself in a deadlock, you'll have a hard time getting the information you need to evaluate the candidate.
Scrutinize the candidate's behaviour. The way he solves problems, he may have solved it in a technical or smart(insidious) way.
Here, buzzwords like Singleton, encapsulation etc. will fly out anywhere and if the candidate really knows what he/she's talking about, smile. This part you will hear with enthusiastic elaboration how the candidate tackled the problems using a pattern and how they mixed patterns to come up with a solution or sets of solutions.
How one tool sucks from the other, that x database is better than y database for a particular task. OR you'll see an empty stare and a hum here and a hum there.
At this part, while you're still browsing halfway of the candidate's CV. You know if he/she's a go or no go. And can immediately write your recommendations. Potentially save your company some money etc. etc.
I have mastered this skill during my days on the Dark Side. You can formulate your own questions too. But the real key is preparation.
Comments
Having given about 30 interviews myself over the past few years, I can identify the 2 questions they asked which actually told them what they really needed to know (since I didn't get that job, I now know exactly the sort of person they were looking for) -- so basically it was 2 1/2 hours of time wasted for me. Those questions could have been asked first -- along with some basic personality indicators to show whether or not I would mesh with the team -- eliminating the hours of technical testing until they were sure I was the right sort of mentality for the job.
JRB
You can tell a lot by how quickly they get stumped by PATH, CLASSPATH, where the JDK is on the machine & simple compile errors.
I find it a bit amazing that some people interviewing for a software engineering job refuse to even attempt this test. How can I rely on such a person to be able to debug on a QA machine that doesn't have (insert fav. IDE here)?
1) Does the candidate give up or refuse to try something
2) Does the candidate work well under pressure
3) Does the candidate demonstrate clear thinking
4) How does the candidate react when mistakes are pointed out
I tend to ask stuff that is far to hard for anybody to get in an hour long interview. It is more about their methods and reactions. And my ability to feel comfortable with that person.
Anyway, what got me was the questions on the java test. It was like some guy who thought he was God's gift to java wrote them. It was like he said "What kind of questions over obscure java topics can I ask that will stump them?" I was thinking the whole time, what kind of info are they going to learn about me with these idiotic questions? And what's worse, right after I had started the tests, the four interviewers came in and sat down in front of me to watch me take these stupid tests.
Later when I was done, one of the interviewers said with a smirk on his face, "The last guy who we interviewed claimed to be a great java developer, but he didn't get ANY of the questions correct." And I was thinking, yeah, I can see why. These questions are stupid. If he would have memorized some of the rarely used parts of the JDK, he might have gotten a few of them correct.
Anyway, the test was this densely packed, cryptic Fortran code (I told you I'm an old fogie!)--it was pretty nigh incomprehensible-- and the interviewer, an engineer himself, looked kind of apologetic as he handed it to me. So I stared at it a bit and all of sudden it occurred to me what the code was doing, mostly because I'd recently done a similar algorithm on a project at school.
So I say, well it's (I can't really remember it now, I think it was some kind of day,month,year or bubble sort or some algorithm like that, cleverly diguised) what I thought. The interviewer says, Yeah, tell me more, so then I notice some additional aspect, because I'd 'gotten' it, and basically told him what the code was.
Okay, so that's a long story, but the reason I'm posting here is because they then proceeded (in a subsequent interview with the manager of the group) to tell me that I was ONLY candidate that had EVER figured out the code. What kind of job did I want?
The manager was a real jerk, from back in the old days when the boss was boss and everything he said went. I was happy they offered me the job, but I turned them down because the manager was such a jerk.
They then badgered the Co-Op program director at my Univ. to ask me why I wasn't going to work for them (they were a big engineering firm, like Bechtel type--but not Bechtel--who was doing some really cool real-time process software to monitor power plants, etc.)... Then, they kept calling me. In fact, that manager tried to get me to take a job with them at least 3-4 more times over the rest of my univ. career!
What a bunch of idiots! Just because I 'happened' to solve their stupid cryptic puzzle, they thought I was gonna win a Nobel prize or something.
Anyway, just wanted to relay an example of 'passing' the test and how stupid that can be, too! It really tells you very little.
Cheers,
Brad
This is one of the most insightful comments posted for this blog. It did occur to my mind "what if I am compelled to do something that I am not supposed to do or don't want to do? Will I react gracefully or with hostility?". Thanks for the post.